JOUR2, Blog #8

• Recent Issues
• Topics
• About
• Contributors
• Events
• Subscribe

Media Companies Successfully Fight for Access to Information About Church Officials’ Role in Priest Sex Scandal

The article I found has had a lot of controversy on it's topic. A church was found guilty of pedophilia, the story began with the priests' sex scandal with young boys. The numerous victims of the priest sued the church and won, they court agreed to releasing the personal information of the accused priests, however that wasn't enough. The press that was supporting the victims wanted more information to be released to the public about the community church that was involved even though the court had ruled those who knew about the child abuse private disclosure. The press presented a case to the judge explaining why the names of those involved should be released as public record. 
This case included the following:
"First, the Press Organizations argued that an order from the Court governing the release of the documents was tantamount to a protective order.  Under California (and federal) law, the party seeking a protective order must establish good cause.  See, e.g., Mercury Interactive Corp. v. Klein, 158 Cal. App. 4th 60 (2007).  Because the Archdiocese had not demonstrated good cause to keep the names of church hierarchy secret, the Press urged the Court to forbid the redaction of the documents.

Second, the Press Organizations argued that because the settlement agreement required the personnel files to be publicly disclosed, the public and press were in the position of third party beneficiaries to the settlement agreement.  See Service Employees Int’l Union, Local 99 v. Options–A Child Care & Human Services Agency, 200 Cal. App. 4th 869 (2011) (“SEIU”).... 

Third, the media organizations argued that the documents – which had been submitted to the Court for review – were court records, and therefore, there was a presumptive right of access under the First Amendment and the common law."

Finally the judge came to the rightful decision of releasing the names of those in the church hierarchy who knew about the abuse and did nothing. Those involved deserve more punishment than just a ruined reputation. They could have put an end to the abuse instead of letting it continue. The public has a right to know who is responsible for these crimes, privacy is a privilege and should only be given to those that deserve it, not those who take advantage of it. 

http://www.medialawmonitor.com/2013/04/media-companies-successfully-fight-for-access-to-information-about-church-officials-role-in-priest-sex-scandal/